Thousands of individuals recently gathered in Copenhagen, Denmark, to voice their strong opposition to the former U.S. President's suggestion of purchasing Greenland. The demonstration, commencing at City Hall and proceeding to the U.S. embassy, underscored a unified rejection of the proposal. Participants, many adorned with red hats creatively reinterpreting a well-known political slogan to express dissent, waved Greenlandic flags while chanting slogans affirming Greenland's inherent value and inalienable status.
Despite widespread opposition, the former President has consistently advocated for the acquisition of Greenland, citing national security imperatives for the United States. He has openly stated his conviction regarding the eventual acquisition of the territory, reiterating this perspective in recent remarks. It is notable that the U.S. already maintains a military presence on the island, a point often raised in discussions about its strategic importance.
Coinciding with the public demonstration, a bipartisan delegation of U.S. lawmakers visited Copenhagen. Their agenda included meetings with Danish and Greenlandic authorities, as well as figures from Denmark's business community. This visit was characterized as an effort to affirm the enduring alliance between the United States and the Kingdom of Denmark, subtly countering the unsettling rhetoric emanating from the former President regarding Greenland's status.
Among the protesters was Peder Dam, a Danish resident, who carried a sign featuring imagery from a classic space saga, conveying a message to Americans to 'return to sanity'. Dam expressed his belief that the views from the White House do not represent the entire American populace. He articulated his confusion regarding the perceived lack of widespread American public outrage, drawing a parallel to how Danes would react to similar threats against a neighboring country.
Another demonstrator, identified only as Thomas due to professional concerns, conveyed a deep sense of betrayal and disappointment towards the U.S. He emphasized Denmark's historical support for the U.S. in military conflicts, questioning the justification for such a disregard for their partnership. Thomas highlighted a significant emotional and political uncertainty prevalent within the Kingdom of Denmark, despite a pragmatic skepticism that an actual invasion of Greenland would occur.
Naja Mathilde Rosing, a native of Greenland, found the protest deeply personal. She asserted Greenland's self-sufficiency and disinterest in being absorbed by the United States, dismissing claims of external threats as a diversion. Rosing vehemently criticized the notion of purchasing Greenland, deeming it profoundly offensive and disrespectful to indigenous cultures that view land as sacred, not a commodity. She drew parallels to historical injustices against indigenous populations, arguing that one cannot purchase a country or its people.
Charlotte Holm, a Copenhagen resident with familial ties to Greenland, reported significant fear and uncertainty among her relatives regarding their society's future. Her message to the U.S. was direct: to cease interference and address internal issues. Holm expressed apprehension about the potential far-reaching consequences of any U.S. encroachment on Greenland, fearing it could fundamentally disrupt global order and alliances like NATO, echoing warnings from the Danish Prime Minister.
Related Articles
Jan 7, 2026 at 2:12 AM
Jul 14, 2025 at 5:15 AM
Jul 30, 2025 at 3:07 AM
Oct 14, 2025 at 9:12 AM
Aug 11, 2025 at 7:50 AM
Sep 23, 2025 at 8:39 AM
Sep 22, 2025 at 6:37 AM
Jul 23, 2025 at 9:49 AM
Jul 28, 2025 at 3:23 AM
Feb 28, 2025 at 6:20 AM
This website only serves as an information collection platform and does not provide related services. All content provided on the website comes from third-party public sources.Always seek the advice of a qualified professional in relation to any specific problem or issue. The information provided on this site is provided "as it is" without warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. The owners and operators of this site are not liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of this site or the information contained herein.